How To Apply To Be A Reader Case Study

Would you like our panel to consider your case?

We don't guarantee to use all applications, and there's no guarantee how quickly we may get to yours. I plan to run no more than one Case Study per month, so there may be a wait before yours gets used.

To apply, please email the blog with your story on theministryoffi@gmail.com.

To help us get a good overview of your situation please tell us as much of the following as possible.

If you share finances with a partner and wish the situations looked at jointly, please include details for both of you.

Age(s)

Kids & ages

Earnings:

Salary

Side hustle income

Monthly spending

Monthly spare gap for saving

Work pension

DB or DC?

Regular contributions

Salary sacrifice?

Employer match details

Balance

Regular contribution

Provider

Funds

Former work pensions:

Balance

Provider

Funds

Personal pension/SIPP:

Balance

Regular contribution

Provider

Funds

S&S ISA savings:

Balance

Regular contribution

Provider

Funds

Cash ISA savings:

Balance

Regular contribution

Provider

Interest rate

Lock-in period

Premium bonds balance

Other cash savings balance

Other investments balance

Emergency fund balance, and is this included in anything above such as premium bonds or cash savings?

Debts

Balances

Interest rates

Own home:

Value

Mortgage balance outstanding

Mortgage interest rate

Rate expiry date

        Term remaining

Investment properties:

Value

Mortgage balance outstanding

Mortgage interest rate

Rate expiry date

Rent

Agent costs

Maintenance costs

Void periods history?

Anticipated inheritances

Goals Retire early?

Up/Downsize house?

Gifts to kids?

        Other?

Other relevant info

Reader Case Study #2 - DB couple

Here's another reader case study where our panel of three experts give our analysis and suggestions.

Today we have a couple in their early 40s, who both have defined benefit pensions which will give them some security in later life. They're asking what they can do to retire early to enjoy lots of travelling with their kids.

Hi Andy

I wondered if we might be a useful case study for your readers.

We're 41 and 43. Both in local government so db pensions which make planning a bit more difficult.
2 very young kids. Have a savings rate of about 60% each and live reasonably frugally - just who we are, not by choice to get to FI really.

We did the Rebel Finance School course in Feb/ March and devoted a lot of time to doing the homework and getting our ducks in a line and managed to invest in the market in April - I was lucky and hit on dip day 7th April, put a bit more in over the next fortnight, partner got his money in over that first week or two as well, and have been steadily investing since.
Combined we have about £42,500 in SIPPs, waiting for the tax to hit, just over £84,000 in S&S ISAs. And a private Aviva pension of £27k.
I earn just under £40k, but this will drop to £35k next March as part of a restructure position change, and my partner earns £31k.
Goals - well, I wish I had known about this in my 20s and started to invest then so I could live off the income now, even if that meant going back to work in say 10 years, as I really wish I wasn't working during these early years of having children. Not because I want to be a SAHM, to be honest, I love them, but I don't think I'm the sit down and play type of Mum I thought I would be. But I'm struggling to work and manage everything at home, and being a calm, present parent is hard, and it would be lovely to have the freedom to have taken a career break/ drop to a nominal 1 or 2 day work week during this time to keep the db pension going!
But our plans now are to retire, or drop down to that 1-2 days in 10 years, sooner if possible. I thought I would do the maths in maybe 5 years and see whether we could 'retire' in say 7 years and let the funds coast the rest of the way.
The goal is to have the funds to be able to take the kids on epic adventure holidays, like 3 months in Canada or New Zealand, travel Europe, etc, in 10 years time when they're 11/16. To have the funds to match any savings they can save for, so they can travel in their late teens/ early twenties, or if they want to volunteer then we can offer to pay their expenses, for example.
Age(s) 43, 41
Kids & ages 1, 5

Earnings:       Salary £40k, £31k       Side hustle income £0       Monthly spending £1900 combined       Monthly spare gap for saving £1550, £1350 Work pension       DB or DC? Both DB       Regular contributions yes       Salary sacrifice?       Employer match details       Balance £6,800pa and £10,000pa accrued so far, if taken at normal pension age       Regular contribution       Provider       Funds  Former work pensions: no Balance Provider Funds Personal pension/SIPP:       Balance £44,231 (Aviva and IE combined) and £20,308       Regular contribution, into my Aviva £40 a month, personal SIPPs got a lump sum and will revaluate towards year end       Provider, Invest Engine (FWRG), Vanguard (FTSE Developed world) and        Aviva (a mix of International passive fund and a with profits fund)       Funds S&S ISA savings:       Balance £79,024       Regular contribution – yes, all of our gap       Provider T212, FWRG. Vanguard Developed World Funds Cash ISA savings: No       Balance       Regular contribution       Provider       Interest rate       Lock-in period Premium bonds balance £6000 EF Other cash savings balance £6,030, £7,174 (this is now £3,500 less as just moved into S&S ISA, but using June’s tracker figures Other investments balance No Emergency fund balance £6k in premium bonds Debts Balances - no debt just mortgage Interest rates Own home:       Value Roughly £390,000       Mortgage balance outstanding £62,458       Mortgage interest rate 1.34%       Rate expiry date May 2026 Investment properties: no Value Mortgage balance outstanding Mortgage interest rate Rate expiry date Rent Agent costs Maintenance costs Void periods history? Anticipated inheritances No (well, possibly down the line if parents don't need to go into homes, 4 parents in their 60s and 70s) Goals Retire early? yes Up/Downsize house? No, with young kids and both wfh so need the 4 bedroom.
Goals – to save enough to stop or go part time in about 10 years, hopefully less, and use the funds to go on big trips with the kids, be more available for them etc. Possibly do passion projects like crafts/ financial coach/ fertility coach, more travel.
Gifts to kids? - we have started S&S ISA for them, they have about £3500 in each. We plan to get ourselves off to a really good start then contribute more, debating £500/1000 into a sipp and then leaving it there etc. We would like to be able to offer to pay for their travel (or match their savings) or pay their bills if they want to do volunteer work after school/ uni, but we're a good way off that yet with them so young!

Mike

The couple appear financially well-prepared: they have a healthy emergency fund; they paid off most of their mortgage and the remaining balance is at a low rate; they are both contributing to workplace pension schemes; they have additional private pension schemes and ISAs in place; and have started saving plans for their children.

However, the goal to retire in ten years or less with sufficient funds to enable long-term travelling with the children looks difficult to achieve without substantial contributions to their ISAs and private pensions.

The defined benefit pensions provide a guaranteed income but at the current levels of contributions, these are only likely to produce something like £34,000 of income at today’s prices. More importantly, these will not be accessible in full until the couple are 68 in each case.

The private pensions help with this as they will likely be accessible from 58 for each partner. It’s not clear how these are arranged but consolidating them into one SIPP each will likely make them much easier to manage and potentially reduce costs slightly.

Similarly, the healthy ISA balance of ~£80,000 can provide some income if the couple want to retire before they can get access to the SIPPs and private pensions if these have not yet been consolidated.

From here onwards, I’ll assume that all private pensions are consolidated into the SIPPs.

The couple say that they have a savings rate of 60% but only mention £40/month contributions into one of the private pensions and that the SIPPs occasionally get a ‘lump sum’. Other comments about ‘hitting the dip’ suggest that they’re holding onto the money and trying to time the market, whereas in most cases it will be much more efficient to make regular contributions.

Having a large portion of your retirement funds tied up in defined benefit pensions makes early retirement difficult, but the couple have already taken the first steps in setting up parallel private pensions and investing in ISAs.

Trying to estimate ten years into the future is difficult, but we can have a go by constructing a year-by-year table and showing the values of the various investments at each stage.

The focus here is on building a pot of money that will be available in ten or so years and which can support the couple partly or fully until the arrival of first the SIPPs and later the defined benefit pensions.



The lack of detail on things like SIPP and ISA contributions makes it difficult to forecast into the future but I’ve taken some assumptions based on their 60% savings rate which would suggest that they have around £30,000 per year to invest.

This is a very commendable savings rate and a lot higher than many people in the FIRE community, let alone those in the wider world. Without it I’d have cautioned that retirement in ten years looks unrealistic, but we’ll see what it looks like here.

I’ve assumed that any savings will be split 50:50 between the ISAs and SIPPs. With potentially five years between retirement and SIPP access, the ISAs need to be able to support the family for this period on their own, then the SIPPs need to take over and support the family for another ten years until they can get access to the defined benefit pensions.

I’m assuming that: wages go up with inflation; their spending remains the same in real terms; the DB pensions go up with inflation and incorporate an extra 1/49th of salary for each additional year worked; ISA and SIPP investments go up at the growth rate (7% is chosen here as a conservative figure). I’ve also assumed both partners are 43 to make it a bit easier. The numbers are in the table below if you want to refer to them.

With these assumptions, the ISAs should be worth somewhere in the region of £400,000 by 2035. By this time, their basic spending will have gone up to somewhere around £30,000 so the ISA should easily provide enough income to last five years (even allowing for additional spending on travel with the children and some contingency for tax and volatility) until they can access the SIPPs.

Any unused ISAs at this point would obviously enable them to delay accessing the SIPPs, although it may be worth utilising their personal tax-free allowance from the SIPPs even if they are still drawing down from the ISAs.

If they stopped work at this point, the SIPPs should still keep growing and will be worth around £550,000 by the time they can access them in 2050. Their annual spending will have gone up to around £35,000 by then, but the SIPPs should be able to cover the ten years until they can access the defined benefit pensions (with some contingency as above).

By 2060 their defined benefit pensions should be producing a combined income of around £85,000 and their living costs will have risen to around £65,000 so again, this should be covered with some contingency. Any remaining funds in the SIPPs could allow them to defer drawing down from the defined benefit pensions and obtain a higher income from them.

These are very rough estimates and not be taken too seriously, but they give an idea of what sums could be involved.

Any kind of projection is likely to be very inaccurate and the more so for the longer it runs.

The table here is entirely dependent on the numbers given for inflation and growth and will give very different results if these two are changed.

However, by replacing the projected numbers with real ones each year, the couple will be able to get a picture of how their finances are evolving. Once a few years of real data has been entered, the whole table will start to be based on reality and the inflation and growth figures can be tweaked with actual ones or adjusted in line with recent data.

It is worth noting that the state pension will also be available around the same time as the defined benefit pensions. This adds another significant chunk of income to their finances and it may be worth thinking about gifting to the children at this point.

By showing that the numbers could be made to work within the assumptions given, it looks like retirement in ten years might indeed be a possibility if they continue to and maintain their savings rate. While this nowhere near a guarantee, it is a suggestion that the couple could indeed start plans with a view to retiring in ten years with a careful eye on their investments and spending.

At the very least, it suggests that moving to part-time work may well be an option for them around that time: the proposed plan for long-term adventures with the children may raise their spending levels considerably and if not covered by their investments, a small period of part-time or contract work might give them sufficient to cover the additional outgoings.


John

A great starting position

That is an impressive savings rate from two close to average salaries especially with two children.

Also, you are golden once you reach state pension age as your defined benefit plus state pensions more than cover your required expenses at that point.

You are also a decent way on the road to retiring early with your approximately £150K of investments.

All this means is that you are already in the FIRE groove and the most important part, which is the mindset, is mostly or fully there.

Your goals look achievable.

Things to think about

Your spending figure is impressively lean. Does it include allowances for all the long-term but irregular costs you have? Occasional costs such as replacing kitchen, bathroom, car, appliances, phones, and other home maintenance?

Apply own oxygen mask before helping others.”

What is the reasoning for contributing to junior ISAs at this point? You normally only do child investments if you are planning for inheritance and after you are already FI. Or already filling all your ISA and pension allowances.

A nominal amount to get them thinking about money is fine, but generally you build your own FI fund first, then you can gift as much as you want.

Your post state pension income is rock solid as a couple. Even if something were to happen to one of you, there seems to be enough DB plus single state pension to support you in later life. Though how you bridge from earlier retirement is likely to change in that circumstance. You need to have contingency plans.

I guess one fly in the ointment for your savings rate is the end of mortgage fix next year and a hike in mortgage payments. How much will that reduce your ongoing savings rate?

Financing the dream – bucket maths to explore the realm of the possible

There are two ways to finance the big trips. Either accumulate a one-off pot to do so or increase your required income to allow you to do this every few years. In the same way as you allow for big expenses like a new kitchen, bathroom, or car every few years. I will assume the latter and an annual income of £30K after-tax for my bucket maths.

Your DB pensions provide a solid foundation on which to build. I read those as approximately £7K/year and £10K/year now, rising by about 10% of salary every 5 years you work (at 1/49 accrual rate).

For simplicity I will assume your salaries stay the same as we will work in today’s money.

Assuming you work for 10 years more that’s DB pensions of approximately £14K/year and £16K/year in today’s money at state pension age. Adding those on to state pensions gives a pre-tax income of £54K/year or after-tax income of £48K/year. More than you need.

That suggests you could bring the DB start age forward to reduce the bridging pot required, smooth out income and retire earlier. I assume there is an actuarial reduction of about 5% of income per year early (obviously find out exactly what this is).

Assuming you both retire in 10 years and take the DBs at state pension age (68?), then standard FI maths suggests you would need around £550K of investments split one-third ISA and two-thirds pension. That number is not as bad as it sounds as that only requires saving about £20K/year with average returns, due to compounding.

Bringing the DBs forward 10 years with the assumed 50% actuarial reduction drops them down to £7K and £8K per year. Covering half the required income from age 58. That then drops the investments required down to £400K, about 50% ISA. That requires around £15K invested per year.

Retiring at age 50 you need £480K (60% ISA, 40% SIPP) and to be investing around £30K per year, as you are already doing.

Remember all this is bucket maths in today’s money with average historical returns.

You have options – now comes the hard part

From those rough calculations its clear you have options and are well on the way to early retirement. Plenty to think about.

Your retirement age determines the percentage of investments that can be in SIPP, which costs less earnings than the equivalent amount in ISA. Therefore, you want to maximise SIPP until the pips squeak while leaving just enough in ISA. Though that balance is tweakable later as long as the gap isn’t large and you still have earnings to cover pension contributions.

I would start to model various retirement scenarios and contingencies and replace assumptions with reality. It might take you a few years to decide on the course of action and understand all the moving parts. You have time. And of course, the stock market may have different ideas. Good luck.


Andy

This one is interesting because in some ways it is backward to most people's situations. You are on track to have more post-retirement-age income than you need, so you don't need to build a self-sustaining investment pot - instead you need a pot to burn through on your way to your DB pensions.

First off I'd like to say that living on about £23k for a family of four is a great start. You're right when you say that you are frugal by nature. It makes everything else easier.

Your DB pensions accrued so far, when added to your State Pensions, will give you about £40k of gross income at normal pension age. This will already comfortably exceed your spending, and it will become larger as you stay working there for longer and accruing more entitlement. I think you will be in a position to draw upon it earlier.

Taking your DB pension early reduces it by around 5% per year. The snag is that the State Pension part of your retirement income can't be taken early, and that will be the lion's share of your £23k spending. The most useful takeaway from this is that you'll have excess income which you can use to support your kids at that point. For me this deprioritises use of JSIPPs.

It also means that you can afford to reduce your DB pensions by taking them early. At the extreme, taking them ten years early may cover about half of your spending. I'm making a guess here as to how much more DB entitlement you accrue. But this does mean that as you head to personal pension access age at around age 58 you can afford to have a relatively small pot built up. I think I'd want it to be somewhere above £100k in today's money, but not all that much above it.

You currently have about £64k in personal pensions. With about 16 years until access, left on its own that is likely to become a pot of about £200k in today's money. That's ideal. In that situation I wouldn't throw much more money at the personal pensions, for use as retirement income, though we may be able to use some of it later on to help your higher spending on travels in the time after pension access age.

(One thing to note here is that you should figure on voluntarily paying each year to get your State Pension up to maximum. It's a great deal.)


We can now turn our attentions to your more immediate goals.

Current invested wealth in ISAs:£79k.

Contributions: 1550pm + 1350pm = £2900pm x 12 = £34,800pa.

Plugging those numbers into a compound interest calc, if you got typical investing conditions, in five years you may have a pot of around £320k in today's spending power.

In ten years it may be £660k. 

We'll come back to this.

How much do adventures cost?

I've done a lot of travelling. For many years I figured on spending £100 per person per day, and this worked well for everything from cruises to European citybreaks to long-haul slower travel. Prices have now moved on a bit, so perhaps a figure like £130 is more reasonable. You're frugal, like me, so these figures may not be far off.

Families of 4 travelling together will often have economies of scale. In many destinations a family room will be available for the same or not much higher price than a double. Four can share one hire car. Then there's the fact that not all of your spending on travel days is additional to your base living costs - you are still eating only the once. 

Let's use a guesstimate of £300 per family per day, across all sorts of travel. That would give us a £27k cost for a 3 month trip.

Should we assume one of these 3-month epic adventures per year? That would give us desired spending of £27k plus the baseline £23k spending, so £50k per year.

Let's loop back to those savings pots and see how they apply to £50k annual spending.

In ten years time you'll be 53 and 51. The £660k pot would need to sustain you for 6 years until pension access age. That pot could clearly sustain such withdrawals and is too conservative.

In five years time you'll be 48 and 46. The £320k pot built by then would need to sustain you for 11 years until pension access age. On a compound interest calc that pot runs dry.

We're hunting, but we already know that you can retire in between 5 and 10 years time.

In seven years time you'll be 50 and 48. A £440k pot built by then would need to sustain you for 9 years until pension access age. On the compound calc this leaves you, on average, with about a £200k pot. Nice.

If we hit poor investing conditions you'd delay your plans, but it looks to me like you're broadly on track to retire in about seven years.

This does include the big assumption that you'd spend an extra £27k per year on travelling for a big 3-month trip, and continuing this until state pension age, and longer if you get that £200k excess at the end. Maybe that will change as the kids get older? Perhaps the profile will be fewer family trips, more couples trips (which will also be a bit cheaper), and then more of this money may go to supporting the kids in other ways - any volunteering or travel goals they have of their own, or perhaps buying a home.

You're on track for about seven years. You could build some extra padding into the plans by working longer. Or you could slow things down by going part-time before then. That part is up to you.

That may also be around the time that your mortgage is cleared. We've not talked about that, but if the payments are in your current spending then it's covered anyway.

JISAs and JSIPPs

Contributing to Junior ISAs can be tricky. The kids get full control when they reach 18, and there are only your stern words stopping them from blowing the lot on vodka and Lego. (Or whatever their vices are.) Many parents prefer to save in their own accounts with the intention of gifting later.

A Junior SIPP is a massively long-term project, but the rewards are equally massive. A £1,000 contribution into it during childhood may equate to around £2,000 per year of income in retirement, in today's spending power.

I think £4k is about the max to put into a JSIPP. If you were to contribute £4k in infancy, with top-up that's £5,000, and by age 58 when they get access that may be a pot of £265k in today's money. It would sustain ten years of early access at £24k per year, followed by ongoing withdrawals of £12k a year to top up a state pension to £24k spending. And this is on top of any compulsory workplace pension contributions they are obliged to make.

With your own saving, you are getting to the point where you'll max out your own ISAs. If you do that, and are faced with instead investing on a taxable basis, that would push more into wanting to use the kids' allowances.

Conclusion

You're in great shape, due to your frugal living. Another seven or so years of this should set you up for life. It may be that you want your kids to be a bit older before you embark on the big adventures - you had talked about ten years, so maybe that would suit you going part-time somewhere along the way. It all depends whether you prefer to work longer at a gentler pace, or go for the travel adventures as soon as possible.

I'm very conscious that there are a lot of moving parts here. How much will you really spend on travel, how much will you travel each year, and for how many years will you maintain that level of spending before slowing down? Will you throttle back and work part-time? 

You have enough encouragement to keep on doing what you're doing and begin to make retirement plans with a view to retiring in the next 7-10 years. But beyond that, I think you will need to keep reviewing the numbers along the way, as well as firming up your spending plans. There's going to come a point where you have to make decisions about whether to work a little longer in order to fund more travel spending.


Want to be a case study? Read more here


Want to read more of my ideas? I have a new book out - Build Your Retirement, 5 ways to improve your wealth in retirement. Or other books here

Or you may prefer my FIRE series for beginners.


Just A SIPP

If you simply need a SIPP (Self Invested Personal Pension) to begin throwing your savings into, here's my guide to which are the best.

Most of the do-it-yourself investment platforms offer a SIPP account, but the fee structures vary. Things also get more complex if you are pricing up a platform to also host your ISA or GIA, so for simplicity today I'm purely looking at SIPPs.

A SIPP is the best place for most of us to begin building our financial freedom fund. The only exceptions are really if you plan a very early retirement, where you'd need some funds accessible in an ISA to give you a source of income before you reach pension access age at around 57 or 58, or if your income is for some reason unpensionable, for instance if it comes from rents from properties. Only earned income from employment, or self-employment, is valid to go into a pension and get the tax breaks. Or perhaps you are lucky enough to have a solid Defined Benefit pension at work, and so you only want to work on funding an earlier retirement.

InvestEngine

The cheapest is InvestEngine, who offer a free SIPP, but they do have some shortcomings. Their product is very restricted. They don't allow you to transfer other pensions into your account (except from Vanguard). There's no helpline to phone. They don't support employer pension contributions. They don't offer drawdown in retirement "yet" - you would have to transfer somewhere else at that point.

There is also the fact of them being a loss-making startup, which some people find concerning. They are regulated, so your money is safe in that respect - if they exited the market then the regulator would pass your account to another platform, and you would not lose your investments. But there is some scepticism about how long they will continue to lose money doing this, and whether this will lead to them selling their client book to someone else, or introducing fees.

For these reasons I'm going to exclude IE from my later price analysis. They're the cheapest, if you can handle their shortcomings.

The Middle Field

After this we reach a general crop of platforms, the middle field. Fidelity, AJBell, Hargeaves Lansdown. These are all okay, but not great. Their fees tend to be a percentage of the pot, and some charge for trades. These can often work out the cheapest choice with a small pot and where you need to accept employer contributions. 

Vanguard

Vanguard are well liked as the home of index fund investing. In the 1970s their founder Jack Bogle invented the index tracker fund, and in the USA Vanguard is run as a mutual entity, with no-one taking a profit, just run for the benefit of the members. (The UK arm isn't a mutual, it's just a subsidiary of that US home office.) Their fees are low - and between about £10k and £100k invested they may well be the cheapest option. 

But Vanguard have their oddities, including some serious shortcomings. They don't accept regular employer contributions to pensions - only for directors of the company with payment by company debit card. On transfers, they are consistently the slowest platform by some way. And for personal contributions they are fussy about banks, with some clients reporting that they won't accept contributions from some challenger banks despite these banks being UK registered.

Vanguard's fee structure is 0.15% of your investment pot per year, with a minimum charge of £4 per month and a cap of £375 per year. This means that between about £30k and £100k they are often the cheapest mainstream operator. That's provided they're an option for you because of the payments issues.

Vanguard's other oddity is that they only offer their own funds. Which may be fine for you.

Interactive Investor

For larger pots, Interactive Investor become cheaper than Vanguard. In some situations they may be cheapest at lower levels than that, too, such as if you only use a SIPP. This is because, like the others, they have a complicated charging structure, in this case based on which accounts you hold as well as some introductory tiers like their Pension Essentials product which is £5.99 for up to £50k, whereupon you switch to their full SIPP at £12.99.

As an industry, these guys all need to simplify their fees!

II accept employer contributions, company contributions, and personal contributions. They are full service with a phone helpline. They offer a full range of investments. They have "free regular investing" where you can set up automated funding of the account together with automated buys of popular funds and UK shares, which are done in a batch once a month. The settings for this are quite sophisticated. You can give it a priority list of things to buy, complete with amounts, and it will happily cope with you asking to buy more than the money in your account - it will just fill what it can from the priority list. Lastly, it will allow you to change these settings as frequently as you like, and set up extra amounts for this month only. I find that this covers almost everything I want to do. I've been with II for about 15 years and I'm quite a fan. 


Mathing It Up

For this analysis I'm going to look at the costs and price break-points between the different platforms.  Here are their fees to begin with:

AJBell   

0.25% platform fee per year

£1.50 fund dealing fee / £5 ETF dealing fee


HL        

0.45% platform fee per year

No fund dealing fee / £11.95 ETF dealing fee


Fidelity 

0.35% platform fee per year

£7.50 dealing fee - online / £1.50 dealing fee - regular savings plan


Vanguard

0.15% platform fee per year / Minimum £4pm fee = £48 per year / Fee cap of £375 per year

No dealing fee


II            

£71.78 platform fee per year for up to £50,000 invested.

£155.88 platform fee per year above £50k.

Free regular investing once per month / Additional dealing fee £3.99

As you can see, the combination of annual fees and fees-per-trade means that the maths will depend upon how often you trade. For simplicity I'm going to model the costs for an investor who contributes once per month on a regular basis, and who uses the cheapest type of fund available on that platform, either regular fund or ETF.

At the bottom end, AJBell initially look cheap but twelve of their £1.50 dealing fees adds up. It means that for a beginner, Hargreaves Lansdown are cheapest. 

HL win for £0 - £9,000 (fees at £9,000 = £40.5)

AJBell win for £9,001 - £19,200 (fees at £9,001 = £40.50)(fees at £19,200 = £48)

Vanguard win for £19,201 - £47,852 (fees at 32000 or under = £48)(fees at 47,853 = £71.78)

II win for £47,853 - £49,999 (fees at 47,853 = £71.78)(fees at 49,999 = £71.78)*

*I don't think it's worth moving to II during this short window.

Vanguard win for £50,000 - £103,919 (fees at 50,000 = £75)(fees at 103,919 = £155.88)

II win for £103,920+ (fees at 103,920= £155.88)

Because of II's two tiers of SIPP pricing, they appear and then disappear.

Bear in mind that because of II's "first year free" referral offer, it is still worth moving to them in the year before you reach that £103,920 figure.


Exclude Vanguard?

We excluded InvestEngine from the price comparison, because of their limitations. I think there will be lots of people for whom Vanguard are also unsuitable, whether that's because they need to accept employer contributions, or they bank with someone Vanguard dislikes.

If we were to exclude Vanguard, we're left with a window where you'd need to choose between AJBell and II. The revised leaderboard would look like this:

HL win for £0 = £9000

AJBell win for £9001 - £28,712

II win for £28,713 - £49,999

AJBell win for £50,000 to £62,351

II win for £62,352+


Referral Deals

I would never suggest going with a platform just for the referral offers they run, but if you're going with a platform anyway, then it makes sense to avail yourself of their deals.

Of the platforms mentioned above, there are currently referral deals for InvestEngine and Interactive Investor.

With InvestEngine there's a signup bonus of a randomly selected amount between £20 and £100, for both referrer and referee. If you want to use mine, use this link.

With Interactive Investor you get your first year free of platform fees, worth about £155 to you with SIPP-only or about £263 if you have other accounts as well, and the referrer gets a £200 credit to their account. If you want to use mine, use this link.

I'm sure with all of these offers there are details and qualifying criteria, so do look through their offer properly to check it works for you. And in fairness, if someone has helped you a lot and they have a code, it's a nice way to say thank-you to use their code, if you both benefit.


What if I want an ISA too?

The above works for ISA+SIPP, with the exception that Interactive Investor falter a bit by adding a £9 per month charge to add an ISA to your SIPP. Boo! My reaction to that would be to still use the choices as above, but don't move an ISA to Interactive Investor. Instead, use one of the free ISAs which are available - Trading212 or InvestEngine.





Build Your Retirement book cover

Want to read more of my ideas? I have a new book out - Build Your Retirement, 5 ways to improve your wealth in retirement. Or other books here

Or you may prefer my FIRE series for beginners.

Reader Case Study #1 - a nervous millionaire

In this reader case study, three of us are trying our hands at giving a panel of answers to a reader's situation. It's our first time round the track doing this, so let's see if we're any good at it. The usual caveats apply - we're not qualified financial advisors and these opinions are only intended to feed in to people's own decision making processes.

Here's our reader's letter, along with their replies to my follow-up questions:

Hi Andy, I've just followed the link to your Ministry of FI blog via a reply on the Rebel Finance School forum.

My head is all over the place with where I'm at in life. I was widowed about ten years ago, I'm now 61. I am fortunate that he left some properties and we have equity in my house. My obsession is to make sure my kids are looked after with property. My situation is complex. I have ADHD and find it difficult to assimilate and understand information and things just go over my head and I get a mental block.

I would love to find someone to sit down with me, and help me navigate it and make a plan, but I don't think that person exists.

However this offer for 3 people to give an opinion on my situation could really help me out. How do I go about it please? I warn you it's not straightforward!!!

  • Widow aged 61
  • 3 children in 20s
  • PAYE job £1500pm
  • Residential - £340k mortgage (4.19%, £1.1k pm), £1.4m equity
  • £350k savings, ISA etc
  • Final salary pension to come @ £8kpa/£200k transfer value 
  • £30k in private pension
  • £1.2m equity in other property (mortgaged currently bringing £4kpm gross)
  • £300k equity in flat abroad
  • Currently reluctant to sell family home as emotional attachment - maybe next 5 years 
  • No inheritances from anywhere
I know the easiest thing to do is sell the family home and flat abroad but right now not an option.

Objectives: 
  • try to give my children £400k+ each in next 5 years towards buying a house (would be a big deposit for them)
  • have a gross income of £6kpm+ (after resi mortgage) 
  • not to worry so much
  • not to constantly have my head scrambled with what to do all the time - I want a simple plan to take weight off shoulders
Semi commercial rental property, mortgage rate 4.85% until December (the one that brings in £4k).

Currently have an empty BTL, have been trying to sell since December, mortgage 1.76% till next year.

Empty short term let, mortgage rate 4.75% as my market has disappeared. Between these two empty BTL could be another £200k. Didn’t mention these as both empty and not generating any income. 

Phew! Yes, you're right, that's quite complicated. I can see why you're struggling for headspace to deal with it all.

Here are the replies from the panel:

John

Control what you can, ignore the rest

Going in circles or being afraid of doing the wrong thing can stop you acting. It’s an easy trap to fall into, especially while things haven’t gone pear shaped, yet… It needs an action plan guided by general principles.

I will focus on the broad brush and leave the detail to others.

You can have anything you want, just not everything you want.

Initial observations:

Gifting a £400K house deposit for each of three adult children is very generous. It is also over £100K more than the average UK house price. Seems overly generous for a house, but perhaps more reasonable as part of estate planning.

£72K per year income for a single person in retirement is very high. I would work out how much you are really spending, and how much is adding to your cash mountain.

Are there enough assets to achieve these goals? How close are you to paying off the mortgages? Basic maths suggests you need at least £1.3M to support the extra income above state and DB pension and £1.2M for the gifts – after mortgages and excluding your main residence.

When you are in a hole, stop digging.

Liquidate non-working assets

The property voids need to be addressed. I would be trying to sell those properties as a priority at realistic prices. Just getting them sold and getting the capital working makes sense.

You need to come to a decision on downsizing your home and selling the foreign property. The older you get, the harder the decision to move is likely to become.

The income you need, paying off your mortgage, and the capital for gifting, requires liquid money apart from your main home.

Never leave free money on the table.

Take free money and get your money working

With £48K of rental income and £18K of employment income you are a higher rate taxpayer. Yet you are only contributing about £500-£600 to pension from earnings. I would strongly consider contributing the remainder of those earnings to a pension and claiming higher rate tax relief on your self-assessment. E.g. you could contribute say £12K a year to a SIPP, automatically get £3K added by HMRC as basic rate tax relief; and then claim another £3K as higher rate tax relief.

I would also strongly consider investing most of that cash for long term growth and income. You can reasonably expect to live 20+ years on average from here.

Planning for care

This is difficult to plan for, as the average amount of care funds required is only a few tens of thousands, which you could cover out of regular income. But for about one in twenty people it can run to perhaps a quarter of a million on average. All you can do is contingency plan and potentially have property (typically your home) that you could sell to cover the near worst case so you can have good quality care.

Be extremely wary of putting your home in trust. It’s generally considered a bad idea.

Keeping it in the Family

Inheritance Tax Planning and Gifting

I note you are likely to have less than the examples below unless you pay off all the mortgages. This is just to paint the picture and give examples.

If you pay off all the mortgages, then you have assets of around £3.5M. That’s likely over a million pounds of inheritance tax on death. Assuming you inherited your late spouse’s main inheritance allowance (Nil Rate Band) of £325K then the first £650K is inheritance tax exempt. (e.g. £3,500K minus £650K = £2,850K of taxable assets at 40% = £1,140K inheritance tax).

You would normally have your main home allowance (or Residence Nil Rate Band) as another inheritance tax exemption if leaving it to children. But you lose £1 of home allowance for every £2 you exceed £2M in your estate. Assuming you inherited your spouse’s home allowance you have £350K total. You therefore lose it completely at £2.7M.

Your current plan is to gift £400K to each of the 3 children (and live 7 years). That would reduce the estate by £1,200K and potentially regain some of the house allowance (Residence Nil Rate Band). If your estate is reduced to £2.3M then you keep £200K of the home allowance. (e.g. £2,300K - £650K – £200K = £1450K at 40% = £580K inheritance tax). I believe if you gift more than the main inheritance allowance in 7 years then the recipient is on the hook for the inheritance tax and not the estate.

You need to decide where the assets to gift this money will come from.

As almost all your assets are physical and not liquid there needs to be a plan to pay the IHT after you die. Whether that’s a life insurance policy in trust or some other method it needs thinking about and planning for.

I also wonder if there are other ways to shield your rental assets from inheritance tax. But that would need an inheritance specialist. Beware complex and expensive schemes.

Mike

I think it’s helpful here to start with the stated objectives, then with some observations dealing with separate areas and finally with some actions to address each in turn.

First, the objectives:
  1. The £400,000 gift to each child (totalling £1.2m) does not seem at all plausible in either the short or medium term as there are simply not enough assets available.
  2. Similarly, the desired £6,000 monthly income seems very unlikely as there are not enough assets to generate anywhere near this level of income.
  3. I can understand the level of concern as the wealth is tied up in various properties which do not appear to be performing well and these require a lot of involvement.
  4. The goal of simplicity is admirable, but there will need to be some major changes to get to a point where the finances are more manageable.
What is missing is any sense of a plan, including:
  • How long do you intend to carry on working?
  • Do you enjoy your job?
  • Is there any potential to increase your salary?
  • Are the children self-supporting or do they need your financial help?
The biggest initial concern is the imbalance between illiquid assets (property) and income: the current income of £18,000 p.a. will rise by £8,000 with access to the final salary pension at 68 and a further ~£12,000 from the state and private pensions, but this still only adds up to a gross figure of £38,000.

The high residential mortgage figure of £340,000 is another concern, especially when approaching retirement and it would seem relatively trivial to use some of the £340,000 of savings outside the ISA to reduce this to a more manageable amount with a view to discharging the mortgage completely in 5 or so years, in time for retirement?

The remaining cash invested in the ISA could be switched into a stocks and shares ISA where it would at least start to grow and eventually provide an income to supplement the pensions.

The £4,000 gross monthly income from the £1.2m invested in commercial property represents a poor 4% yield, even before tax and other costs are taken into account. Is this several properties? And could they be rationalised to remove the poorer yielding ones?

So far, I’ve only mentioned the financial issues and these shouldn’t decide what sort of life is wanted. What are the non-financial priorities? Since the family house is such a huge proportion of the net worth, there is no real hope of reaching anything like the income levels suggested without selling it.

But could this be an opportunity to start a new phase of life nearer the children and grandchildren maybe? And in a smaller modern house that requires less upkeep, with lower utility bills and one near accessible transport links for going away to travel?

Many people see property as their pension but overlook the level of involvement and the many things that can go wrong, especially later in life. If simplicity is a priority, then this does not sit well with owning property and relying on it for a stable income.

The general financial priority should be to move from unreliable (and poorly-performing) property income to pensions and investments that will look after themselves. There is already some small pension provision (see above) and this could be augmented with a self-invested pension funded from the current work. Obviously, any increase in salary would also help this to provide more money in the future.

As I see them, the actions required would be as follows:

1. Expedite sale of current empty buy to let property – i.e. lower the asking price – and get rid of the empty short-term let and foreign properties (not forgetting to pay any applicable capital gains and foreign taxes).

2. Pay off the residential mortgage within 5-10 years from savings, the equity released above or from income but be careful not to exceed any repayment limits.

3. Rationalise commercial properties with help from an estate agent and review rent and maintenance etc. – what is the return on equity and is it competitive?

4. Start self-invested personal pension (SIPP) and maximise contributions from job – if necessary, live off equity released above, allowing ~100% of salaried income to go into the SIPP until retirement.

5. Construct a five to ten year plan to downsize from current house, maybe aligned to the planned retirement date? At this point give the children a portion of the released equity, balanced with the additional income required, with the remainder invested in a general investment account and gradually transferred into the ISA.

6. Balance the income from the pensions, ISAs and set a sensible level of 3-6 months’ expenses into an emergency fund in readily available savings or Premium Bonds.

All of this will require discussion with the whole family and better with a family friend who knows about property (such as an estate agent) and someone who knows about investing.

At this stage I’d be very wary of talking to any finance professionals but make sure you complete the Rebel Finance School course before you do.

Andy

With a net worth of over £3 million, you could clearly retire today and live happily ever after, without running out of money - except you first have this legacy property portfolio to untangle, an attachment to expensive properties, and your head is in a spin.

There is clearly some excess in your plans, in various directions. You want £72k of annual spending, which is nearly double the RLS top tier spending level. You want to give £1.2m to your kids. And you want to keep a £1.75m home and a £300k flat abroad. Running these two homes probably goes a long way to explain the £72k desired spending figure.

You are most likely going to have to compromise on one of these fronts, but let's see what we can assemble before we simply take an axe to your plans.

Your assets look something like this, if liquidated:

  • £350k savings / ISAs
  • £30k DC pension
  • £1.2m rental properties, less CGT, leaves an estimated £1,056,000
  • £200k additional empty properties, less CGT, leaves an estimated £176k
  • Total £1,612,000.

I'm making a guess on the CGT liability. I'm assuming the worst case of you paying 24% if it all falls into the higher rate tax band, and that the properties have all doubled in value during the time you've had them. If they're held in a limited company, that would change things.

I'll also round that total down to assume that you'll reduce some prices in order to get a sale. Let's work with £1.5m.

With this £1.5m how can we give you the desired annual retirement income? It takes some shoehorning to make it work:

  • £30k "basic" retirement income
  • £42k "stretch goal" retirement income
Let me explain my workings on that retirement income. I've done this using my "two pots" method. 

If you were to buy a global index tracker fund, say Vanguard FTSE Global All-Cap, you could withdraw 3.5% per year and I think you would be utterly safe in depending upon doing that for the rest of your life. 30,000 / 0.035 = £857,000. Buy £860k of this fund and you can withdraw your backstop £30k from it on the 1st of January each year for life, and I think this would have withstood any bad event in the history of stock markets without running out. Oh, and you can safely adjust the £30k figure upward each year by inflation.

But that's only £30k out of your desired £72k spending. So what's next?

A second pot, for all of the optional spending, which doesn't have to be quite so safe. The idea here is you try to reduce withdrawals from this pot during a crash - so you cut down on things like holidays and new cars. You buy a different fund, to make it easy to keep track of which one is which. For instance, Vanguard FTSE Developed World Ex-UK. Use your remaining £640k for this, and we'll apply a more relaxed withdrawal rate, since this pot isn't for the critical "needs" money, it's in the "wants" category. To get a £42k spend from a £640k pot, 42/640=0.065 so that's a 6.5% withdrawal rate. Definitely not in crazy territory. If you get a bad sequence of returns in the early years of your retirement it may reduce the size of your pot, but it's not likely to hit zero before you slow down in your dotage. In any case, in about five or six years time you have a boost coming when both your State Pension and your Defined Benefit pension begin paying out, around £20k per year between them. There will be some tax on this level of income, but it should reduce the withdrawal rate from this pot down to around 4%. This de-risks this part of the plan - the pensions are the cavalry arriving later on in the battle.

Finally we come to the gifting, along with the elephant in the room - staying in a £1.74 million home and keeping a £300k flat abroad.

Why don't we roll these together? The kids each get £100k once the flat abroad is sold. This gives you a positive reason to let go of it, when you are ready to. And similarly, when you are ready to downsize your main home, you gift a third of the spare proceeds, after buying your next home, to each child. To reach your goal of gifting them £400k each in total, this would mean downsizing by £900k into a £840k property. These figures are broad-brush and don't include moving costs, but they give you an idea of what could be done. 

I do have concerns that a gift of £400k goes way beyond what's necessary. There is helping them, and there's running their lives for them. 

When you come to downsize both your home and the flat, this will reduce your spending.

Currently you have three excesses. Your home(s), your desired spending, and your level of gifting. We can accommodate any two of these right now, leaving the gifting for later. If you're willing to compromise on either the homes or the level of spending, then you can gift straight away.

Finally, this analysis brushed quickly over how you'd get from your current position to having all of your capital productively invested. You have empty properties, and properties up for sale which are not moving. I think this means that you need to lower prices to fit the reality of the market. The longer this takes, the more it is costing you in mortgage interest. 

The priority is to dispose of the properties. I appreciate that there would be a small benefit from going slowly and selling one per year, in order to use a fresh batch of Capital Gains Tax allowance each year, but I fear that the overall effect of slowing down the project will be costly (more mortgage interest) as well as not being good for your mental health.

In short, I would stop being a landlord as soon as you possibly can, and become a passive investor. Simplify your life, and I hope that this will also remove stress. I fear the same goes for your home and flat - sometimes we are "owned" by our possessions, and I wonder if you would be happier if you simplified your living arrangements along with fulfilling all your gifting goals and setting up a passive income from the global funds.

Finally, I wonder if you will talk through your goals and the ideas from the three of us with your children? Discuss their goals too, and have a frank discussion about what will happen to your estate once you are gone. Perhaps they would prefer more modest help with property but some additional help with their investment goals? It may be more productive to help them use up their own annual tax allowances to build investment wealth over time with a view to becoming financially independent and being able to retire earlier. Setting them up with £400k-deposit houses risks encouraging a level of spending which they will struggle to maintain. Maybe some simplicity would be good for them too.

If you look at your wealth in terms of it being family money, gifting it down the generations sooner rather than later allows you all to pay less tax and helps retain that wealth.


Want to be a case study? Read more here


Want to read more of my ideas? I have a new book out - Build Your Retirement, 5 ways to improve your wealth in retirement. Or other books here

Or you may prefer my FIRE series for beginners.